4.6 HIV/AIDS

UNDP is working on HIV prevention and the reduction of its impact. As the key development partner, and co-sponsor of UNAIDS, UNDP helps countries to put HIV at the centre of national development and poverty reduction strategies; build national capacity to mobilize all levels of government and civil society for a coordinated and effective response to the epidemic; and promote and protect the rights of people living with HIV, women, vulnerable and marginalised populations.

Minority groups are one of the key populations at higher risk to HIV. Interventions for addressing HIV prevalence in minority groups must take a ‘social determinants of health’ approach. According to the World Health Organization, social determinants of health are shaped by the conditions in which people live and work, conditions that are created by inequalities in access to power and resources; these social determinants are “mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries”.31 Ethnicity, language and religion are among the factors that can influence health inequities. Public policy responses to HIV may not be effective for minority populations if strategies are based on addressing risk factors characteristic only of majority populations and not adapted to minority cultures and social realities. Minorities living with HIV may have unequal access to health care because of discrimination in health care services, lack of culturally adapted healthcare or higher poverty levels that reduce affordability of retroviral care. Existing infrastructure for medical services may be more limited in remote or impoverished areas where minorities are settled. Minorities are more vulnerable to HIV-related disease in countries where they have higher incidences of injecting drug use and human trafficking.

Gender inequality and unequal power relations between and among women and men continue to be major drivers of HIV infection. HIV prevalence in women and girls is closely associated with intimate partner violence, challenges in negotiating safer sex and other manifestations of gender inequality. Gender inequality and harmful gender norms are not only associated with the spread of HIV but also with its consequences, such as violence targeted toward HIV positive women and girls. These risk factors might impact differently on women and girls from minority groups because of different cultural practices and different experiences of social exclusion. For example, some minority women are more vulnerable to human trafficking, because of higher levels of poverty or because they live close to transit routes where prostitution is predominant, increasing the risk of contracting HIV.

There is a clear relationship between HIV and human rights violations. Stigma, discrimination and violence are often directed toward persons because of their real or perceived HIV status and because of behaviours, such as sex work, injecting drug use or same-sex relations. People who are marginalised may be disproportionately exposed to human rights abuses, both in general and as related to HIV. People living with HIV face additional stigma and discrimination, often deterring their access to treatment, care, support and prevention services, and resulting in multiple discrimination.

Promoting and protecting the rights of people living with HIV, especially those who are marginalised, is critical to an effective AIDS response and fundamental to yielding public health and development benefits for populations as a whole. UNDP works with countries to create enabling human rights and gender responsive environments. UNDP supports countries to address gender inequalities – through the empowerment of women and girls and sexual minorities (i.e. men who have sex with men, transgender populations, lesbians and bisexuals), while also engaging with men and boys to challenge harmful gender norms.

In order to reduce the prevalence of HIV in ethnic, religious and linguistic minority groups, specific policy interventions should be developed. Taking into consideration of the social determinants of health approach, prevention measures need to be culturally attuned and focused on the risk factors that are particular to each minority community. Minorities could be trained as health care providers to improve community HIV prevention programmes. Minority health workers could ensure that culturally appropriate health information is made available in minority languages, while also addressing discrimination issues that minorities may face from health workers. Box 11 outlines some of the efforts in the United States to reduce higher HIV prevalence among minority groups. Special efforts are needed to reach minorities in remote areas and to provide primary health care services that are adapted to minorities’ cultures, environments and traditional medical practices. Box 12 illustrates some lessons learned from HIV education projects in the remote areas of the Upper Mekong region.


  • Cultural stigma and poverty can result in higher rates of HIV among minorities
  • Discrimination can prevent minorities from accessing equal health services for HIV
  • HIV policy responses need to take into consideration specific cultural risk factors for minorities and the impact of discrimination

BOX 11. REDUCING HIGHER RATES OF HIV/AIDS AMONG MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES

Figures from the U.S. Government show that HIV prevalence among some minority populations in the US is higher than other groups. For example, African Americans constitute 13% of the population yet represent nearly half of new HIV cases. Hispanic and Latino communities are 15% of the population but 17% of new HIV cases. These groups also have shorter life expectancy once diagnosed with HIV. Broadly speaking, the differences are attributed to higher incidences of poverty, higher rates of injecting drug use, sexually transmitted diseases or unprotected sex, and cultural stigma around sexual health issues and social norms of sexuality.

The Minority AIDS Initiative, created in 1998, is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ larger Initiative to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health by the year 2010. The Minority AIDS Initiative provides funds to community-based organizations, faith communities, research institutions, minority-serving colleges and universities, health care organizations, state and local health departments, and correctional institutions to help them address the HIV epidemic within the minority populations they serve. The Ryan White Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 codified the Minority AIDS Initiative. The National Minority Aids Council (NMAC), created in 1987, represents a coalition of 3,000 CSOs and AIDS service organizations delivering HIV/AIDS services in ethnic, racial and religious minority communities nationwide. An example of a specially targeted programme by an AIDS service organization is the American Red Cross Hispanic HIV/AIDS Programme, which aims at raising HIV/AIDS awareness for Hispanic communities. The bilingual programme was created based on languages, customs, family relationships, spirituality, sexuality and health beliefs of Hispanic and Latino communities.


BOX 12. PREVENTION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG ETHNIC MINORITIES OF THE UPPER MEKONG REGION: LESSONS LEARNED

The UNESCO Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific coordinated a project aimed at HIV prevention among ethnic minorities of the Upper Mekong Region. This project was implemented in selected communities in southern China, northern Laos and northern Thailand, where the risk of HIV infection is very high, due in part to higher incidences of human trafficking and injecting drug use among ethnic minority groups. Under this project, educational materials were developed in local languages, in order to counter the lack of culturally appropriate information regarding HIV prevention among ethnic minority communities. In the Phase I of the project, a detailed survey of the HIV prevalence amongst the ethnic groups in the pilot areas was carried out. Based on this survey, preventive materials (posters, booklets, video cassettes, audio tapes, puppet shows, etc.) in local languages in the three pilot areas were developed. These materials were tested, evaluated, modified and have been reproduced for use by NGOs and other community organizations to promote HIV education.

The project evaluation highlights important lessons learned for future work on HIV prevention with ethnic minority communities. Among the findings and recommendations of the evaluation:

  • Translation of materials into local languages was positively received. However, the materials were not always based on the particular ethnic audience, but instead imported from lowland cultures. Stereotypes and mainstream responses to problems were reproduced without taking into account the particular vulnerabilities of ethnic minorities. In China, videos produced using local footage and featuring the Lahu minority culture and custom proved more effective.
  • More use could be made of non-formal teaching networks and teachers to help instigate behavioural change, rather than just knowledge transfer. Education on the social development context, and directed to risk factors of specific cultures and behaviours is needed. The moralising approach and stigmatization of traditional cultural practices was considered unsustainable. It was recommended, for example, that condom use be promoted in the practice of multi-partner sexual relations rather than prohibition of pre-marital sex.
  • The surveys prepared were problematic (due to length and culturally inappropriate questions) but did reveal some trends, including that knowledge of HIV is not well integrated into local understandings. The greatest value of the survey was to encourage dialogue with local ethnic minority communities on the issues. Traditional healers were not sufficiently referred to as resource persons, and more time could have been allocated to ensure the participation of community members with direct experience of injecting drug use or commercial sex. The promotion of grassroots involvement at all stages of the programme was strongly recommended.

Back to top